Great work here.

A structural element of Game B will have to be complete and immediate transparency between the entities/organizations that are in a position of power/control and the participants being ‘controlled’. This allows for a more transparent alignment of incentives, complete evidence of compensation, and the feedback loop of agreement/disagreement from the participants.

Think Information Theory and the entropy/distribution of information/resources/power. This will place more responsibility on the ‘controlled’, but also allow for greater collective consensus/shared responsibility.

Transparent, Thaler-esque nudging will be the tool of directional systemic change, agreed to by majority concensus vs. Blue Church control/manipulation.

Transparency, nudging, collective consensus, aligned incentives, more personal responsibility, ‘Information Theory-esque’ distribution of information/resources/power.

One man’s opinion…

These features are the structural DNA of the ‘Venture-as-a-Service’ platform we’ve launched at The Legacy Funds https: //bit.ly/2M8n8IF, to at least unlock the concentration of both venture activity and entrepreneurial activity from Silicon Valley, NYC & Boston, and do deliver on what Eric Weinstein suggest: ‘…to re-distribute the ability to take risk’.

As posted this past July in Pitchbook, Venture Capital is Hurting the Economiy. https: //bit.ly/2NjpZ2w

Would welcome chatting with you Jordan at your convenience.

Joe Milam

joe@thelegacyfunds.com